Orders slip between other messages
Orders arrive mixed with questions and small talk. The one that got missed surfaces when the buyer chases it.
Your team does not have to stop using a messaging app. What has to change is what happens after the order arrives.
This page is written for those who already tried an off-the-shelf app and then stopped using it.
Orders arrive mixed with questions and small talk. The one that got missed surfaces when the buyer chases it.
Someone spends part of every day copying chat into a spreadsheet. Typos travel with it and nobody checks.
Sales are recorded in one place, goods leaving in another. The gap appears at the physical count.
A transfer receipt is sent and then buried. When the invoice is chased, nobody can show whether it was paid.
An app exists, yet the team keeps a private spreadsheet because the app does not follow how they work.
The second and third instalment slip because nothing but human memory tracks them.
Without forcing customers onto a different channel and without replacing every system at once.
Wherever the order comes from, the record ends up in one place with a number, a status, and an owner.
Goods leaving are recorded because the order changed status, not because someone remembered to log it.
What is not due yet, what is overdue, and what is paid are visible without searching.
Who approved what and when is recorded, so nobody has to ask who made the call.
No more two versions of the recap between sales and the warehouse.
The entry point is not forced to change. Only where the record ends up changes.
The first stage is deliberately small. What matters is that one class of mistake stops happening.
Order number, customer, contents, status, and change history.
Stock movement tied to order events, including manual adjustments that stay on the record.
Invoices, instalments, paid marking, and payment proof stored against the order.
Internal approval steps that follow the rules already in force at your company.
Daily and monthly recaps plus exports for bookkeeping.
Separate access for sales, warehouse, finance, and the owner.
The exact figure follows a locked scope. What we can state now is the entry point and what moves your position inside the range.
From Rp 25 million
Delivery in 4 to 12 weeks
The entry point and duration above follow the Web App Custom package already published on our website development page. The upper bound depends on the final scope and is written into the proposal before work begins.
Check the Web App Custom package on our website development pageA single order channel is not the same as orders arriving from several channels at once.
A service business needs no stock movement, and that removes a large part of the work.
Marking an invoice paid by hand is simpler than connecting to a payment provider licensed by Bank Indonesia.
The more steps an order must pass, the more there is to test.
A consistent spreadsheet moves faster than files whose shape changes every month.
Connecting to the bookkeeping or shipping system you already use adds work.
Sales and business operations sector
We built a sales system covering the deal pipeline, quotations, invoices, a document portal customers open without an account, per-role data scope, and payment. It is our own product rather than commissioned client work, and it runs in production. A single deployment holds many workspaces, with data separated at the database schema level.
What matters here: the hard part is not building an order form, it is keeping one number the same across the system while many people change it at once.
See the full portfolioIf your problem is not transactions after all, these three are closer.
For occupational safety reporting duties and safety training providers.
For healthcare facilities whose system exists but is not connected yet.
If what you need first is a public page rather than an internal system.
Usually not the app. Off-the-shelf apps are built from an average workflow, while what keeps your business running is often the step that is not average. When the two collide, the team picks the faster route and the system is abandoned.
No, and we do not recommend it. What works most often is taking the one part that causes the most mistakes, fixing it, then checking whether the next part still needs work at all.
That is fine. Forcing customers onto another channel is the fastest way to lose orders. What we tidy up is what happens after the order is received, not how customers reach you.
Enough to stop the single most frequent class of mistake. If the first stage already touches five areas at once, the scope usually needs cutting again.
Yes, as long as the columns are consistent. Files whose shape changes every month need tidying first, and that is separate work we list separately in the proposal.
Yes, through a payment provider licensed by Bank Indonesia. Registration and the agreement with that provider are in your own business name, not ours.
The source code becomes fully yours once the project is complete and payment is settled.
One real example is more useful than a requirements list. From there we can point at the part to fix first.